Sunday, November 13, 2011

Which Came First, the Porn or the Hegemonic Thinking....

After sharing our pornography research papers with the class, we discussed the common themes presented in each project and what we have concluded. The following post is composed of my immediate thoughts upon hearing my peers’ research projects and discussing them as a group.
            Socially constructed gender roles and the relationship they have with pornography was a topic brought up. I am really interested in the dilemma: does porn in the media mirror our reality or is our reality shaped by such porn?  This question is particularly important because of the accessibility and influence that sexualized media has over our society. Pornography can be obtained free of charge to any age group via the Internet. Not to mention the mainstream media that depicts pornographic images in a less intense manner. When people see such images constantly, they begin to accept it as a norm. These internalized ideas are then displayed in day-to-day actions, forming not only what people think or do, but also who they become.  As seen, the heavy influence pornographic media has over individuals is a scary reality.
            Life is composed of relationships- relationships we have with ourselves, family, friends, coworkers, acquaintances, etc. When individuals’ have trouble forming and maintaining relationships with others, they are jeopardizing their potential at a successful life. I definitely think that individuals who view these pornographic images, especially in their more intense form, are at risk of having these images and the ideas they depict burned in their minds, affecting how they think and act. Although not all people are affected this way, I believe that it is a possible risk to some. This risk should not be taken so lightly by pornography industries and the media. A specific idea that is brought through pornographic images is male privilege. When this idea is a primary focus, it distorts the viewers’ mind into believe that males have an innate privilege over women. Obviously, such thinking can be extremely harmful in forming and maintaining relationships.
            Porn focuses on male privilege, a theme depicted in our patriarchal society where men often dominate the home, the workplace, and even predominantly run our country. Similarly, women in pornography are depicted in ways that also mirror society. On one hand, they are shown as hypersexualized beings, only needed for pleasure.  They are often submissive, naïve, and willing to do anything to please a man, no matter what emotional or physical effects it has on them. This can be seen in society, where women dominate the prostitution and stripping industries. Also, women are often seen as only a means of reproduction- for men to be able to create children that will carry on their legacy. The stereotype is that women are to bare and rear the child while also nurturing the man. This thinking, then, claims that women only exist in context to the men they are to care for.
            On the other hand, women in porn are sometimes depicted as dominatrix. Some may argue that this is their attempt to take control of the sexual situation- giving them the power that men usually have. However, is this really the case? Can women depicted in pornography really have complete control over a man? This “flipping the script,” as it is called, may be an attempt for women to gain control. However, once again, they are seen by male viewers in one light- as a means of sexual stimulation. No man watching such pornography is sitting there thinking that the woman taking sexual control over the man is respectable. Instead, they find it as a means to fulfill sexual desire, a desire incorporating women having control only in the bedroom.
            Therefore, back to the question at hand- does pornography mirror society or does society mirror pornography. Well, obviously society came long before pornography was established, even as an idea. All a society needs is a few individuals to lead a product to success and a large enough audience to demand the product. Pornography was created as a glorified and magnified version of hegemonic men’s ideas that women have a specific, subordinate role in society- to please men and bare children. Pornography is the number one aid to this way of thinking. Although it is a common way of thinking for some men, if pornography was to be monitored more closely and tamed appropriately, I think society could potential deter such thinking, especially in young children.

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Sex Sells...Everything

It wasn't until I consciously looked through magazine adds that I realized how true the "sex sells" motto actually is. Products that no one would ever associate with sex are being sold in a way that degrades the human emotion of love to a psychologically controlling device that is lust. Woman in nothing but underwear are being used to sell everything from cleaning supplies to shoes. Even worse, these woman are often the product of extensive digital alteration. Not only are thighs being trimmed down and eyes being widened through these procedures, woman that don't physically exist are being created out of a collage of body parts. Such pictures of these unrealistic woman brainwashes viewers, especially adolescence, into believing that this unnaturalness is beautiful and is supposed to be desired by everyone. Young girls begin to compare themselves to these standards, resulting in depression. So why, then, do producers continue to allow such images to control the media? The answer lies back in the fact that "sex sells." Companies, despite how successful they are, are too concerned with profits to challenge the system. This

Now, I may be crazy in this thought, but I don't know very many woman that would go out and buy this purse because a woman's vagina is hanging out. Her whole upper torso is erased, leaving only her....uh, goods? Whoever the creative director was of this ad definitely needs to reevaluate who their audience is.




Dear Burger King, as appealing as this ad is, I will never give your "Seven Incher" a b-job.
Here we see a woman, eyes wide and mouth opened, looking as if she is about to give oral sex to...a sandwich. While seven inches is impressive, this ad is not.

The "S" in S-Class obviously stands for "slutty," just saying.
Once again we see woman degraded mean body parts to advertise something that has nothing to do with breasts.

And, it gets worse. Not only are children affected by these images, they are even the subject of them...


If this little girl was a grown woman, men would be sexually stimulated by such an image. But this girl doesn't seem to be any older than 10. How can the media draw the line between images such as this one and child pornography? Some may argue that she is not exposing any inappropriate body parts, but that's not the point. The point lies in the purpose behind why the photo was taken. I find it hard that anyone could argue that the purpose behind this photo isn't sexually driven.


How far will advertisers go to make a dollar? Exploiting women and children is no ethical way of selling a product. Media that depends on advertiser support should be more conscious of the material they are selling their audience. There definitely needs to be a rebellion against such explicitly degrading advertisements.